MAGA rots. In any movement, there’s elitism and populism, and then there is a sliver of idealism. Idealists are always in the minority but lend the luster of integrity and principles. Elitists mainly care about position, status, and privilege. Populists mainly crave red-meat, a sense that the Great Man is watching out for them and making them FEEL PROUD. The elitists love to manipulate, the populists are ripe for manipulation, like when the Tea Party movement was usurped by Con Inc.

MAGA elitism was represented by Mike Pompeo who got on the Trump Train to manipulate patriotism into more gung-ho imperialism and hegemony. Trump populism is well-represented by truck drivers with MAGA hats. They feel eviscerated by globalism and look to Trump to restore their sense of national pride and purpose. The danger of populism arises from its unthinking passions that are easily swayed.

MAGA idealism, on the other hand, hoped that Trump would at least try to deliver on draining the deep state swamp, calling out the Neocons, end the unnecessary wars(that only serve Israel’s megalomania), defend free speech(against DEI and other repressive forces), and pursue a more sustainable long-term economic policy centered on US industry.

It was that bit of idealism that gave the MAGA movement a bit of shine, e.g. Tucker Carlson atoning for his Neocon past and urging Trump to fulfill his mission as a Peace President. And the expectation that Trump would restore free speech under attack by the elites, ‘woke’ mobs, and the Jewish Lobby. Also, that the US would focus on domestic problems in a sober way. It is why even Democrats like Tulsi Gabbard and RFK Jr. joined the Trump team. It’s why Trump decisively won in 2024 because the Democratic Party became almost synonymous with corruption, abuse of power, mendacity, incompetence, war-mongering, and horrors in Gaza. In other words, Democrats lost its idealists.

So, even though the populists voted for Trump with rather primitive red-meat appetites(or their FEELINGS) and the elitists supported Trump for hegemonic reasons(or what’s good for Israel as too many Democrats were in the streets demonstrating against Israel), MAGA had a bright spot in having its limited but real cheering section of idealists or principle-driven figures.

In a symbiotic way, populism and elitism can go hand in hand. Though opposites, populism can be steered toward elitist ends. For example, Trump has decided to restore army base names like ‘Fort Bragg’ to the delight of many US soldiers, many of whom are politically or socially conservative. It sounds like a win for the populists against the elites who pushed the ‘woke’ agenda. But it also means more working class and lower-middle class being drawn into the military. Whose wars will they fight? If the US gets into a hot war with Iran, they will do the killing and dying for Zionist supremacist elitists.

In contrast, the MAGA idealists stand on principle and reject both elitist deceptions and populist gullibility. Without them, MAGA just turns into a political perversion of the elites using Trump as the ‘man of the people’ to sucker the childlike masses.

Trump has already betrayed the MAGA base but hasn’t totally lost the idealists. The venal elitists(led by Jews) want Trump to suppress free speech and persecute dissidents in service to Zion.
The sucker MAGA populists have been persuaded into believing that such are patriotic actions against foreign elements. It’s the idealists who’ve been calling FOUL on the sham.

With this attack on Iran, it could well be that Trump will lose the idealists, and MAGA will turn into just another Tea Party circus. Not that Trump cares much at this point. In the end, it’s all about his big fat ego. If the Jewish oligarchs praise him as the ‘New Churchill’, his vanity couldn’t resist the flattery and will just kick the idealists into the gutter. And the populist masses will cheer on Trump as the Big Tough American who showed the world who’s boss. America First will go from meaning ‘We should care about America first’ to ‘America is first in the world, so bow down before it.’

MAGA will be just another Cuck Soup.

Video Link

As for Iran’s dilemma, it has once again demonstrated a timeless truth of man and nature: The side only doing defense will lose to the side doing offense and defense.
The nature of the mismatch doesn’t matter. A black bear is many times bigger and stronger than a badger, but if it only defends itself against the badger, the latter will eventually win. If a big strong boxer confronts a smaller weaker boxer but only plays defense, he will eventually lose.
Indeed, this was true of the dynamics that led to the Jewish takeover of the US(and the West). By cleverly manipulating the Holocaust Narrative, Jews made ‘antisemitism’ the ultimate taboo. Thus, Jews could attack, offend, insult, impugn, and defame other groups, but other groups couldn’t do the same against the Jews. At best, goy groups could only defend themselves against Jewish accusations but couldn’t likewise go off on the Jews. Jews could emphasize the Italian-American role in organized crime, but Italian-Americans were hesitant to mention the extent of the Jewish involvement. Jews could speak of the ‘Arab Mind’ or ‘Russian Mind’ in critical and even negative ways, but speaking in a similar vein about the ‘Jewish Mind’ would have been cause for outrage and moral panic. Zionists could invoke ‘from the river to the sea’ in their dream of Greater Zion, but when Palestinians spoke the same words in the spirit of liberation, it was deemed a call for ‘genocide’.

Jews keep asking, “Does Israel have the right to exist?” while ignoring the obvious counter-question, “Does Palestine have the right to exist?” If so, its right to exist was erased by the Zionist project.
Of course the obvious answer to “Does Israel have a right to exist?” would be, “Yes, but not on Palestine”, just like if someone were to ask, “Does Germany have a right to exist?”, the proper response would be, “Yes, but not on Poland, or on Russia for that matter.”
If Bob takes over Bill’s home, it’d be silly for Bob to ask, “Do I have a right to a home?” when his ‘home’ was established by confiscating Bob’s property and evicting Bob.

Besides, if the West loves Jews so much, why not hand over some of its vast territories for a price(and Jews sure got lots of money, what with Blackrock buying up entire properties). So much of Canada, Australia, and the US sit vacant, truly ‘a land without a people for a people without a land.’ Been to Montana lately? Especially since the history of ‘antisemitism’ is usually associated with the West(where the Holocaust happened), a just outcome would have been for the West to hand some of its land to the Jews as a homeland.
Instead, whites, in all their venality and foulness, chose to direct Jewish ire at the Middle East. That way, especially by supporting the Jews against the brown Arabs, whites could cleanse their own image of ‘antisemitism’ and posture as redemptive supporters of the Holocaust Folks against the hateful Arab/Muslims savages and hordes as the New Nazis.

The Zionist rationale never made sense. Israel was deemed necessary because Jews needed a safe homeland from specter of ‘antisemitism’. Then, why build a nation where Jews were bound to be surrounded by unfriendly or downright hostile countries? Also, if the Jews had to leave the West, where the bulk of them resided, to found a safe homeland elsewhere, doesn’t it imply that the West is the most hostile and dangerous to the Jews? If so, who is the West to be accusing other countries of ‘antisemitism’? Just think: Jews must leave the West to have security in their homeland in Israel. Doesn’t it mean the West is the most terrible place for the Jews? But logic wilts under Jewish pressure. It’s like Schrodinger’s Cat: The West is at once the most ‘Anti-Semitic’ and the most Philo-Semitic.

The West prides itself as the most supportive & protective of the Jews and often berates the Arab/Muslim countries as the most ‘Anti-Semitic’. Following such logic, shouldn’t the Jewish homeland exist in the West(Europe or the US or Canada or Australia), where whites/Christians are so full of love and admiration for Jews, than in the Middle East, the supposed hotbed of Arab barbarism, Islamic intolerance, and general cutthroat murderousness? “We whites care so much about the Jews that we’re gonna help them set up house in the most dangerous place on Earth.” That sounds crazy.

Of course, Jewish Zionists insisted on that part of the world for historical, cultural, and spiritual reasons, but if the priority of Zionism was ‘safe homeland for the Jews’, it didn’t jibe with the Western Narrative that the Arab/Muslim world is dark and barbarous, a land of tyrants and terrorists.
As for the Christards into Biblical rationales as to why Jews are the Chosen with eternal right to the Holy Land, haven’t they figured it out that Jews turned the place into Sodom and Gomorrah and a safe haven for pedophiles and gangsters. A GloboHomo Mecca?

Of course, the reality was always far more complex than was propagated by the Jewish-controlled media. Just like there was no single united white/Christian world against Jewry, there was no single united Arab/Muslim world against Israel or Jews. After all, it wasn’t the Jews who defeated Nazi Germany but an extensive alliance of white countries from the US to UK to Russia.
Likewise, especially given the Western Imperial legacy in the Middle East, many Arab/Muslim countries came into being as satellites of the West. And even independent countries like Egypt eventually came under the US fold through threats and bribery. Indeed, the bulk of the Middle East and North Africa comprises cucks and puppets of the Jewish-controlled US as lone superpower than independent-sovereign countries, among which Iran is nearly alone, especially with the total destruction of Libya and Syria.

Video Link

The only real difference between White/Christian cucks and Arab/Muslim cucks is that the former talks the talk and also walks the walk, whereas the latter talks the talk but doesn’t walk the walk. In other words, Whites/Christians preach total obeisance to Zion and practice it, whereas Arabs/Muslims preach resistance to Zion but practice cuckery to the Zionist-controlled US, which makes them indirect puppets of Jews. Lindsey Graham says, “I will suck Netanyahu’s cock” and then sucks it, whereas Saudis and Turks say, “I won’t suck Netanyahu’s cock” but then do just that behind closed curtains. It’s all a charade, the Arabs and Turks pretending to be with the Palestinians but doing the bidding of Zion. Such snakes. It’s like the US and Israel using ISIS, Al Qaeda, and other Jihadi elements to destabilize countries they don’t like, all the while pretending to be in the Middle East to fight those terrorists. The vileness is now out in the open, but the powerful flout the rules of decency like a bunch of gangsters. The world has become Jewish Gangster Paradise.

Video Link

The current state of the world isn’t surprising given that terminology has been corrupted with the hysteria over ‘antisemitism’, now often used to smear Arabs and Muslims who decry Zionist madness. It’s all very ironic since Arabs are Semites, more so than European Jewry who rule Israel. Calling Arabs ‘anti-Semitic’ because of their tensions with Jews/Israel is like calling non-German Europeans ‘anti-white’ for condemning and/or opposing German aggression in World War II.
It’d be like accusing the native blacks of Liberia of ‘racism’ for resisting the actions of repatriated American blacks who enslaved them. (Liberia was like Black Zionism, with members of black diaspora returning to Africa as their true homeland. The problem was the black returnees treated the black natives like whites treated blacks in the South. And later, the Semitic returnees, the Jews, treated the Semitic natives, the Palestinians and other Arabs, like total shit.)
Now, it’d be crazy to let Germans hog the title of ‘whiteness’, but Jews get to hog the title of ‘Semite’ in the West. So, when Jews smite countless Palestinian Semites, that isn’t deemed ‘anti-Semitic’; however, if Arabs call out on the Zionists, that’s ‘anti-Semitic’.

The problem runs deeper with how the term ‘antisemitism’ is employed. The very notion should be rejected by humanity because it says being Anti-Jewish is unconditionally, universally, and eternally evil and wicked. In a sane and normal world, there’s a reason to be pro-something and anti-something. It’s all conditional to the time and place. While it’d be stupid to be kneejerk anti-German, putting down even Beethoven and beer-and-pretzels, one could understand why some people would be anti-German at a certain time and place. What Pole living under German rule during WWII wasn’t anti-German? Likewise, American anti-Japanese rage was understandable following the attack on Pearl Harbor. And surely many Vietnamese had cause to be anti-American during the war.
Therefore, we accept the reasons for various peoples being anti-something under certain conditions. If Jews had only been nice to the Palestinians, anti-Jewish feelings among Palestinians would seem odd, even offensive. But how can Palestinians not be anti-Jewish given the Nakba and the Occupation and the mass slaughters?
Besides, Jews were never slouches when it came to fomenting fear and hatred against certain groups. For example, the Jewish-run US fanned anti-Serb sentiments all over the Balkans on the basis of atrocities committed by the Serbs(though, to be sure, all sides did likewise). Jews believe that, given the time and place, anti-Serbian attitudes were most justified, especially among Albanians in Kosovo.

In contrast, the way ‘antisemitism’ has been defined, the idea is that any hostility whatsoever toward Jews, Jewish Power, or Zionism is evil, wicked, horrible, intolerable, and etc. If Germans had concocted the term ‘anti-Aryanism’ and convinced the world that it’s the worst sin, then the Poles and then Russians would have been denounced for daring to fight back against the Germans. Why, their violent resistance would be ‘anti-Aryan’. Thankfully, such idiocy never took root, which is why the Warsaw Uprising was deemed heroic despite its violent acts and ‘terrorism’.

In contrast, the Gaza Uprising of 10/7 has been deemed a great crime against the Jews. Never mind what the Zionists have been doing to Gaza over the decades. The Palestinian uprising was denounced as evil because the conception of ‘antisemitism’ has instilled the West with the truism that Jews are always good and right, and therefore even the bad things they do is ‘good’, whereas even noble resistance against Jewish abuses is ‘evil’.

The narrative-dynamic is playing out again in Israel’s attack on Iran. It’s called ‘pre-emptive’ or a case of ‘Israel defending itself’. In contrast, Iran’s response is characterized, even condemned, as ‘offensive’.

But then, Israel’s flouting all international rules and possessing 200 nukes(many aimed at Iran) have been handled as No Problemo, whereas Iran’s enrichment for civilian purposes has been reason enough for the entire West to conspire against that country.
In order for this hypocritical lunacy to end, we must retire the term ‘antisemitism’, thoroughly corrupted and discredited by Jewish supremacism’s exploitation of it. The term is employed as insistence that Jews must be unconditionally praised and supported at all times and that any criticism of Jewish Power is ‘rabid and virulent’.

Honor is impossible among cucks.

With the horrors in Gaza, Jewish Power let the mask slip. Jewish groups that once said opposing Israel’s policies isn’t necessarily ‘Anti-Semitic’ are now saying Anti-Zionism is synonymous with Antisemitism. They’re saying this when Israel has been acting worse than at any time in its history, at least since the Nakba.

Now, a fundamental problem of Iran was its entire approach to Israel & the Empire of Judea was utterly misconceived. There are two kinds of powers/peoples in the world. Those that appreciate compromise and reciprocate in kind when the other party concedes on some matters. Thus, a sense of mutuality develops between the two parties.
But there’s another kind of power/people, one that is arrogant, megalomaniacal, contemptuous, and stingy. Such has to have everything its own say, or its way or the highway. It has quasi-monotheistic god-complex, i.e. “We are totally right all the time simply because we are superior.” It’s like the master is always right, even when he is objectively wrong, vis-a-vis the slave.

Such a power/people view compromise as weakness, mental and/or emotional. They never negotiate in good faith and view the process merely as a game through which to hoodwink and destroy the other party, like how con-men act in David Mamet’s films, pretty spirited depictions of the Jewish worldview.
But then, as gangsterism is despised by humanity, Jews usually project their own evil onto others, e.g. Israel, which acquired 200 to 300 nukes(by means more foul than fair) and aims the bulk of them at Iran, has the chutzpah to accuse Iran of being a nuclear threat, and to ALL HUMANITY than just to Israel, which, by the way, devised the Samson Option of blowing up Europe in a nuclear armageddon were Israel to fall.

In other words, Jewish Power usually acts in bad faith. It never accepts the good will of the other side as reason for mutual respect and compromise but merely sees it as the naïvete of idiots dumb enough to trust the Jews and their Western cuck dogs. Surely, Jews were laughing harder than Hillary Clinton when Gaddafi was sodomized with a bayonet and lynched to death. The fool had trusted the West, ROTFL.
Jewish Supremacist contempt oozed from every pore when Netanyahu and his gang demanded the Libyan Option for Iran. Imagine that. The entire world knows that Gaddafi was fooled and Libya was destroyed, but the vile Jew Netanyahu still has the temerity to invoke it as a viable plan. Jewish Power simply sees the world as dummies to fool and idiots to destroy. Come to think of it, some of the biggest Jewish holidays commemorate how the Jews tricked the enemies and led them to slaughter. How many religions have holidays like that?

Negotiation and compromise are good but ONLY WHEN two or more parties come to the table in good faith and genuine willingness for understanding. Diplomacy never works when one side merely bides time to deceive the other side. Consider how Russia was tricked by Minsk I and Minsk II while World Jewry played him like a fiddle. Putin ended up with egg on his face. Despite his many achievements, Putin lost a lot of time and energy in trying to come to some kind of understanding with the Jewish-run West, which is now decency-incapable.

It’s all the worse because corruption and treachery are infectious when they begin at the top: Fish rots from the head down. As Jews control the West, their cuck goy minions, the white dogs, feel obliged to go along, in the process turning into obscene cretins themselves.
Of course, their tender egos cannot accept the truth of their roles as amoral flunkies of Jewish gangsters, and so, they pretend to be outraged by the infamy-of-the-month(as chosen by Jews), such as the ‘unprovoked Russian aggression’.

The predilection is evident in Trump as well. Perhaps, he really wants to be known as a peace-maker and do business with every country in the world, but, when push comes to shove, Jewish Power is his master. Instead of admitting he’s a pussy-bitch of the Zionist oligarchs and was helpless to stop Netanyahu’s actions, he huffed-and-puffed like he’s the grand master of history or something. His tough talk at Iran — “we will destroy you unless you accept the Libyan option” — only shows his weakness in relation to the Jews.

Ironically, his attitude toward Iran is merely a variation of the Jewish attitude toward him: “Do what we want, or we will destroy you and your family.” Subconsciously, Trump and white dogs are triggered by Iran because it hasn’t caved to Jewish Power and taken it up the arse like all the Blanka Hundos have done. Iran is a reminder that some ‘brown’ people are a lot braver and have more real pride than Whites & Western Christians who are now mere minions to the Jews.
Blacks were shamed as ‘Uncle Toms’ in the past for sucking up to whites, and in time, blacks were more fearful of being called a ‘tom’ than a ‘nigger’. What is Tom Cotton but a White Tom to Zion?

Along with Russia and others, Iran thought some kind of compromise could be reached with the West. Perhaps, Iranians were thinking of the goy-ruled West of yesteryear, one that was half-gangster and half-gentleman, capable of treachery but also of compromise and give-and-take. That West is gone, and the New West is totally under the thumb of Jewish Gangsters who want it all.
As Michael Corleone understood in THE GODFATHER, Sollozzo’s truce offer was only a ruse, his long-term plan being the total destruction of the Corleone family. And as his father Vito Corleone understood, Barzini(the Soros-like figure) feigned his role as a neutral mediator while pulling the strings behind the scenes. So, even though the Corleones pretended to go along, they had a plot of their own.

In contrast, the Iranians have been hoping that the honorable gentleman side of the West would ultimately prevail over the gangster-side. Thus, Iran went back and forth from hardliners to more moderate figures in the belief that if the Iranian side made more concessions, the West would ultimately welcome it into the family of ‘civilized nations’. But that ‘gentleman’ side of the West is totally gone. Jewish culture never had an honor code, and whites can be honorable ONLY IF they are in control and possess the pride of agency and fair play. That good side of the West was often tenuous, more talk than walk, but it wasn’t entirely absent. Now, it’s totally gone as the Jews-in-charge want everything while the white cucks lack the requite power and pride that could make room for honor, dignity, and integrity. Instead, we just have White Dogs whose only mode of politics is “What can I do that will please by Jewish Master?”

In any deal-making, one must assess the psychology of the other side. Does it have a mindset capable of fair play and mutual compromise? With Jewish Power, that is NO. Does it have the pride of independence and agency? If not, no use negotiating with it.
Imagine any power trying to negotiate with India or Hong Kong when it was under British Imperial Rule. What would have been the point as the ‘leaders’ of India or Hong Kong were always looking over their shoulders at their British overlords. Likewise, the goy cuck West makes a lot of noise about the ‘rules-based order’, but its only rule is total obeisance to Zion. Iran thought it could negotiate with Trump’s administration as an independent entity, but how did it turn out? Israel hit Iran, and there was Trump the dog barking for his master.

All these years, Iran should have been on the moral offensive, making a case against Israel as a nation that acquired nuclear technology/materials illegally, built anywhere from 200 to 300 nuclear warheads, and targeted Iran(and who knows what other countries) with those weapons. Iran should have been incessant on the world stage with these accusations. Instead, it accepted Israel’s nuclear arsenal as a fait accompli.
Even though it had the moral advantage as a country that signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, allowed for inspections, and even had an official fatwa against nukes, it was forced to play moral defense against the truly roguish Israel.

Iran, by not making a case against Israel(a nation with nukes) even as Israel was making a case against Iran(a country with no nukes), allowed itself to be put in the dock: A case of the guilty charging and trying the innocent.
Imagine a man with many guns with lots of ammo accusing an unarmed man of posing a threat. Unless the latter makes a big stink about the former owning lots of guns(acquired illegally), the issue will go ignored while the main attention will focus on the accusation made by the former. The innocent party should never allow itself to be on the moral defensive.
By all rights, the negotiations should have been about why Israel should give up its nukes as no country in the region has any. Instead, it’s been about how Iran must make Israel feel safer even though Israel’s the one that thumbed its nose at international norms, acquired nukes illegally, built a massive arsenal, and threatens not only Iran but the West(with the Samson Option).

It’s like Jews making a mountain out of Iran’s molehill while stupid Iran went along with the pretense that Israel’s mountain is a molehill. Israel has lots of nukes, most of them targeted at Iran, but let’s ignore that mountain of evidence and instead focus on Iran’s molehill as somehow hiding some Doomsday Machine. It’s Heads-I-Win-Tails-You-Lose.

Perhaps, Iran thought that it was pointless to argue about Israel’s nukes since the West will simply ignore it. Also, given that Russia and China were seeking good relations with the West, they dared not fully back Iran lest they run afoul of Jewish Power. After all, plenty of innocent voices have gone unheard throughout history while evil forces commanded the megaphone.

But if the shoe were on the other foot, it would have been different. If the roles of Israel and Iran were reversed, with Iran having nukes locked on Israel but accusing Israel of being a global threat, Jews would not have taken it sitting down. By hook and by crook, loudly or softly, but incessantly, Jews would have made the case against Iran as the real culprit in the manner.
True, it’s far easier for Jews to mold the global narrative as they control most of Western Media(that heavily impacts non-Western media) and have even gone so far as to shut down outlets such as Russia TV and Press TV in the West, but one should never give into fatalism as it affects the very premise of one’s relation vis-a-vis others, especially those that are hostile.

It was Russia’s fatalism that had resigned itself to playing by Western rules, i.e. the Jewish-controlled West set the rules, made the demands, and lodged the complaints, and Russia either complied, remained muted, or offered timid defenses. From day one, Russia should never have accepted the Western template that was intrinsically biased against it in favor of Western elements, especially Jewish Power. Through all those years, Russia tried to accommodate Western pressures as best as possible or at least tried not to offend the West even as it rebuffed the demands, always speaking of Western countries as ‘our partners’ and ‘our friends’. Well, how did it turn out? Fatalist acceptance of the Other’s foundation consigns one to moral disadvantage. This is why Jews never accepted the foundations of Christianity. Had they done so, they would have had to meekly justify themselves to the superior-feeling Christians.

And that’s exactly the kind of trap Iran fell into. In international diplomacy, it resigned itself to a world where it was perfectly normal for Israel to reject the nuclear non-proliferation treaty, secretly develop nuclear weapons, target them at whomever, and make demands on Iran. Rogue Israel went on the moral offensive, and Iran adopted the defensive posture. It signed onto non-proliferation even though Israel hadn’t, built nukes, and targeted them at Iran. It opened itself to endless rounds of inspections while Israel’s nuclear sites never came under scrutiny. It pretended that the US and the West could be impartial mediators between tensions between itself and Israel even though all such organizations were gradually purged of men of any integrity and filled with cucks to Zion. Iran subjected itself to being patted down for guns, switchblades, brass knuckles, nunchakus, and clubs while Israel was let alone to carry a machine gun and several grenades.

This is rather odd because Iran has been resolute on other matters. It never caved on the narrative concerning the Palestinians and never abandoned its support in deference to the false narratives of the Jewish-controlled West.
Arguably, the West’s anti-Iranian stance might have been softened had Iran not been so intransigent in its geopolitics. But, Iran never compromised its integrity on such matters to appease the West, even if it meant sanctions, military threats, and sabotage. It stuck to its Islamic revolutionary principles.
Then, why did Iran deal with the nuclear issue so defensively, accepting the role of the party that had to answer for trespasses when, time and time again, it passed all inspections with flying colors and, furthermore, the party that had violated all the rules was none other than Israel?
Iran’s position on the nuclear issue should have taken a page out of its book on the Palestinian issue. Put Israel(and the West) on the moral defensive. Never stop making the case against Israel’s ill-gotten nuclear arsenal and its existential threat to Iran.

Russia and Iran, as well as any country in the crosshairs of the US-Israel complex or USrael, need to finally wake up and realize that good faith negotiations with the West are impossible AS LONG AS Jewish gangsters are in charge.
Granted, they might as well go through the motions of diplomacy, like the Corleones in relation to Sollozzo-Tataglia-Barzini and later Hyman Roth, just to bide time, but they should never ever believe anything good can come out of such deals as the Jewish Power is playing for total hegemony and supremacy.
In the West itself, did Jews give whites any quarter in their ethno-political struggle to come out on top? No, it wasn’t enough for Jews to be the new elites; they had to compel the white race to strip bare naked, get on all fours, stick its arse out, take the Jewish dong up its bung, and then say “We love it, we love it!”.

Jews want to do to the entire planet what they did to the white race that now worships the Jews like Winston Smith(of George Orwell’s “Nineteen Eighty-Four”) learned to love Big Brother.
And, the problem isn’t isolated in an evil faction of the Jewish community but runs through the entirety of the Jewish Power Complex. After the Iraq War debacle, the supposed Liberal Jews, the dominant force in the community, could have purged the Neocon Jews from the institutions, but the very opposite happened. Neocons were promoted to be editors and writers for influential magazines. They were invited into the Democratic Party to merge with the Neolibs who proved to share in the same biases and hatreds.
If, following the Judeo-Russian War in Ukraine and the dastardly 6/13 attack on Iran, people still think they can negotiate with the Jewish-controlled West, they are beyond mental repair.