“Tel Aviv will be destroyed, their military headquarters will be flattened, the prime minister’s residence will be flattened, Israel will be flattened, its airfields flattened, that’s the future of Israel and there is nothing they can do to stop it.” -Scott Ritter on October 11th, 2023, explaining what his sources say would happen if Israel invaded Gaza.

I wrote a thing yesterday noting that there is an entire group of internet commentators who have been making a lot of wrong predictions since the start of the Ukraine war. It is a group of people, and I said I wouldn’t name them, then I did name Scott Ritter (and Pepe Escobar).

I said “people probably associate me with these people,” and it is obvious why: in theory, I agree with them about every geopolitical issue. I have listened to Scott and read Pepe significantly, and I can’t think of any single matter of principle I have disagreed with them on. (I’m sure they are not quite as “racist” as I am, but that isn’t a geopolitical issue, and I don’t think it has ever even come up in anything I’ve read/listened to from either of them.)

If we went to the broader “movement” of these sorts of activists against the American empire, there would be varying levels of disagreement, perhaps. I completely disagree with John Mearsheimer’s views on China, and I’ve read every book that mentions China (frankly, his books do not really mention China very much) and tried to listen to most of his lectures on the topic. Although in general I agree with his worldview, on China, I completely disagree, and if you want to see where I disagree, you can watch one of several debates he’s had on the issue with Jeffrey Sachs. Sachs is another person I would put in the “agree with him on everything” category, for the record. But regardless of potential agreement or disagreement, Mearsheimer and Sachs, as counter examples to Ritter and Escobar, do not make constant predictions citing secret “sources.” People from various governments definitely talk to John and Jeff, but these men don’t ever use whatever discussions they have with government officials as sources for predictions (Sachs will mention discussions he’s had with world leaders, but he does so in the form of anecdote). There are many others I have read or listened to in both categories, “source user predictors” and analysts, but I think these four men provide a good picture of the different “wings” of the current alternative media commentary ecosystem, and they are also probably the most prominent from each group.

This current iteration of a movement of alternative geopolitical commentators emerged after the Russian invasion of the Ukraine. (Surely, the four mentioned, as well as several I am not mentioning, were around doing commentary before February of 2022, but I think it’s fair to say that that was the starting point of a new popular movement of alternative commentary focused on analyzing the “World War III” battle between the US-Jewish global order and those states intent on maintaining sovereignty in the face of an evil empire hellbent on solidifying global control.) Since this has started, I’ve done huge amounts of reading and podcast listening, and I have come to be very leery of anyone who talks about “my sources are telling me…” I recognize that “anonymous inside sources” is something that has been used in journalism for a long time with a varying, but certainly not great track record. Obviously during the Trump era, “insider sources say” has become a way for the New York Times to just make things up, totally shamelessly. That was also the case in the lead-up to the Iraq war. (To Ritter’s great credit, when he was working as a UN weapons inspector he was one of the loudest voices calling out the WMD scam. Though he knew that from inspecting, not from “his sources.”)

I don’t want to accuse Ritter or any of this crowd of consistently wrong “my sources are telling me…” people of lying. What is clear is that within this movement of anti-empire commentators, “my sources are telling me…” tends to almost always mean that whatever comes next is going to be wrong. It is possible that Ritter and the others are being fed disinformation from actual sources that are lying to them to make the anti-empire movement look ridiculous. But at some point, if your sources have been wrong this many times, you really have a responsibility to stop publishing things from these sources, whoever they are (and whether or not they actually exist), because it is unethical.

Some people were upset that I pointed out Ritter being wrong. And I understand the sentiment, because – one more time – I agree with him on all of the issues of principle. And it isn’t nice to look like you’re attacking people who are “on your own team.” Further, no one is right all the time. I have often stated “I’m right about everything,” and apparently some people don’t understand that there is a bit of self-deprecating humor there. I have been wrong, like everyone is sometimes, but I’m a whole lot more right than most people, and part of that is that as a rule, I don’t make bold, specific “predictions.” I don’t claim to have “insider sources” and I’m not a wizard, so all I can do is look at the available information, put it together, and come up with options for the most likely possible outcomes. Someone could make a list of the things I’ve analyzed and I’m 100% certain I can stand up to any other commentator and be shown to have a much better track record than virtually anyone. I actually can’t think of anyone with a better track record. Sometimes people will point out where I’ve been wrong, for example in suggesting Trump would likely end the Ukraine war in order to focus on helping Israel (which might still happen, I guess, though I didn’t expect him to escalate like he has, so I was definitely wrong on that). Of course I’m not right about everything. But I say: “point to anyone else in this political analysis game who is right more often than me,” and I’ve yet to be given a single name. (I think everyone is aware that many very prominent commentators have made careers off of copying my material while I’m locked in this censorship dungeon, and they didn’t do that because I’m wrong often wrong.)

Video Link

It’s important to remember that a lot of these people are full of shit.

A lot of people on the internet, who are probably at least vaguely associated with me in people’s minds, were making some very kooky claims about how Iran was going to be able to destroy Israel. I don’t want to name any names. But most of you probably know the names.

Israel is now bombing Iranian oil fields, which pretty much means a point of no return, and Iran is definitely not responding by destroying Tel Aviv. Scott Ritter. That isn’t happening, is it? Pepe Escobar. Instead, it looks very much like the entirety of the Iranian military was so deeply riddled with Mossad that all of their defenses were taken off line before Israel even started bombing, and their little drone show was a joke. That’s what it looks like, Scott.

It’s not just Scott Ritter. I’m not trying to single him out. Though if I were to single someone out as saying the most outrageous possible things about the alleged capacity of Iran, it would definitely probably be Scott Ritter.

I am going to repeat what I said: Israel could always destroy the “regime” in Iran. They could always destroy their oil fields. That was always completely within their capacity. Saying it wasn’t was ridiculous and based on totally nothing. What the issue is, I think and have said from the beginning, is that ever since the US invasion of Iraq, when the government was decapitated in like five minutes, Iran has tried to set up a situation where they can fight a long war after the decapitation of the government. Whether they can actually do that, or whether that whole program is also run by the Mossad, I have no idea. But that was always the only possible option for Iran in the case of this war that started this week: to accept the decapitation of the government and to go guerrilla and try to set the whole Middle East on fire and deplete the US military in a decades long conflict where they don’t have a government but they have organized militias which are capable of keeping the drones flying.

I’ve also said that after a violent decapitation of the Iranian government, setting up a “democracy” in Iran is going to go about as well as it did in Afghanistan. So the US is going to have to occupy Tehran and keep bases there and try to prop up some puppet government that everyone is constantly droning and suicide bombing.

You’re also going to of course have the ISIS model of US-backed terrorists invading Iran, but at the same time, Iran has their own foreign groups that will come in. And probably, presumably (one would have to presume), Russia and China will also be sending aid.

But no, the Iranian regime, which literally has no air defense at all apparently (they had Russian stuff but I guess their Mossad agents took it all off line) cannot survive weeks or even days of continued Israeli bombing. But of course, that in no way ends the war. The Iraq war lasted ten years after the government was decapitated, and only ended when the US agreed to basically hand the country over to Iran.

So, the US will have to go in. Like I said they would. Like I bet a bunch of money they would.

Why am I even typing this? Just go back and read the shit I wrote in hundreds of articles before the election.

It’s not a confusing situation. You do not have to be an “analyst” to see how this is going to go.

My question is whether Trump will end the Ukraine war so he can focus on the Middle East. That is one thing I predicted was likely and I still think it seems likely. Of course, Trump hasn’t committed anything to the Israelis at time of writing. He keeps saying he wants to negotiate with whoever is still alive. But Israel is going to make sure there is no one alive to negotiate with, which means that the US is obligated to go fight this war.

That was always the problem. Israel had the ability to start a war that the US had no choice in whether or not they joined, which meant that Bibi Netanyahu was in charge of US war policy. And, as expected, he exercised that ability.

Now we’ve got the thing.

I do think it’s going to take some time before things get really hot and the people who are freaking out are sort of emotional babies. But I could be wrong. Trump has already moved a lot of troops to the Middle East. Not enough, and it will take time to move more. I don’t know how much time. I’m not an expert.

Bibi Netanyahu seen giving a statement on June 12, 2025, explaining the need to immediately attack Iran to prevent them from building a nuke and using it to kill all Jews on earth

Sorry my happening loving friends, but nothing ever happens.

The Israel and Iran strikes are a nothing burger.

Speaking of processed meats, the Jews keep claiming they “destroyed all the mullahs’ salami,” as if the goyim are too stupid to know that Moslems don’t eat pork.

If I had to guess, it appears that Bibi was just trying to sabotage the Trump peace process, and that Iran is aware that’s what Bibi was trying to do. So both things are just reverse bluffs being pre-called by the other side.

Maybe I’m wrong and I should believe the hype. They hype has never been real before, but maybe it is this time. Famously, I do not make predictions, because unlike most internet commentators, I do not believe I am a wizard. All I can do is look at what is happening and process the information through the information and the logic mechanism that is already in my brain, and every indication is that this is a whole lot of nothing.

Jews are vastly exaggerating the damage they’ve done. This is a Ukraine-style “just bomb random apartment buildings lol” style attack. I don’t know if they hit nuclear sites or other important military sites, but there isn’t any evidence of that right now.

The ramifications of this event are going to be – of course – more Jewish whining about the Iranian response. These kikes will literally “preemptively” (“preemptive” of what?) bomb you and murder random people and then cry out in pain when you do some weak drone response.

I guess “tensions will rise” in the Middle East, but tensions were not really doing very well recently anyway, and I’m not even sure what “tensions rising” means when everyone has already reached their point of any willingness to push further. It’s worth noting that destroying the “regime” in Iran doesn’t make a major war less likely and probably actually makes it more likely (the Iraqi “regime” fell about 10 days into the 1o-year Iraq War, and Iraq didn’t spend 25 years planning to fight a war with the US after a decapitation of their government).

Another point worth mentioning is that before the attack the US was mass-moving equipment from the Ukraine to the Middle East. There’s different ways to read that, but I haven’t been able to find any meaningful numbers about how much of what was moved. But one of the points I was pushing before the election was that if Trump pivoted to the Middle East he’d be more likely to downsize the war on Russia, because despite the beliefs of prominent and highly respected yentas like Victoria Nuland and Janet Yellen, the US doesn’t actually have “unlimited resources.” (It just has unlimited money, which is not the same thing, but try explaining that to any woman. Seriously, ask any single woman you know “why don’t you think the government doesn’t just print money and give it to everyone so that everyone can be rich?” I’m really serious, ask any woman that question. Just see what happens.)

But if there was any upshot that was actually meaningful, it would be more animosity between Trump/Witkoff and Bibi, which in itself doesn’t really mean anything and probably won’t result in anything because Bibi is too good and too embedded in the US legislative branch (even if Trump has done his best to root him out of the executive, which is a questionable claim, it doesn’t mean anything when he’s in a group chat with every member of the US Congress).

The only thing that actually interests me about this event is the media narrative. I am watching CNN and Fox and reading the Times and the rest, and they are all saying “Trump tried to stop Bibi from doing this but he did it anyway because he knows that if he starts a war, using American weapons he got for free, the US has no choice but to join the war.” Every single news outlet is just admitting outright that Israel has full control of American policy and that the prime minister of Israel has an absolute ability to declare war in the name of the US in direct opposition to the demands of the US president.

All over the place, on both left and right, this claim coming from the government that the US has a moral obligation to be a slave of Israel because of a pile of shoes is wearing real thin. This event and the unavoidable media admission that Bibi has a right to overrule Trump when it comes to US declarations of war is not going to be good for the polls showing that Americans of all ages (yes, even the boomers) are becoming exhausted with the claim that we are evil if we even ask why it is America doesn’t have a right to control her own foreign policy.

These polls are of course one of the big reasons Bibi is in a rush to get this Iran thing going. I am sure the polls are not totally honest, but they show a post-10/7 Building 7 like collapse in support for Israel – and for Jews in general, frankly, given that Jews made the decision to fully fortify the idea that there is zero difference between the state of Israel and the American Jewish population (which is obviously true, please see Dave Portnoy and every other American Jew, but it’s still slightly confusing to me why they are obsessed with forcing this fact on the population). Despite appearances to the contrary, the boomers can’t actually live forever, and so with every passing day, the “greatest ally because they’re God’s chosen baby-killers who once had their shoes thrown in a big pile” narrative is fading. Unless Palantir’s AI Panopticon Skinner Box actually works like Alex Karp says it does (and it doesn’t actually work like that, as scary as it is), this entire system of an extremely wealthy and powerful minority group ruling every aspect of our lives, determining every policy of our country, micromanaging the behavior of individuals even, while claiming they are the ultimate victims and that any criticism of them is metaphysically evil is not sustainable for very much longer.

Here’s the issue: the other side of Bibi’s “we have to drag the US into a massive war before we lose all support from the Americans” is the now quite popular American Jewish view that Bibi is personally responsible for destroying Jewish power in America, and so he must be stopped. The anti-Bibi narrative has been building among American Jews for at least a year, and it is now the standard narrative in the Jewish media, with the exception of Fox News (and the like), and among academics and basically most American Jews. But again, the Congress is still totally under the control of Bibi, and I don’t think anyone has a way of parsing out how those power dynamics actually work in real life, because they’ve never really been tested on this scale.

There’s no way to know which way this will go, but I can pretty much guarantee it will be disgustingly boring.

Statistically, at some point, it is going to have to happen that happeningfags are going to be right and I’m going to be wrong. But I do not think that day is today.

I was supporting Israel because of all of the work our brave white women have done to support women sports, and how they are being destroyed by the radical trans gender movement. I was also big on Israel because of Mexicans burning American flags, and because AOC is trying to do socialism.

But then I open my digital currency game application and find a very bad red line and they say Israel makes the red line go like that.

Don’t get me wrong, folks. I love women’s sports and I want the death penalty for burning American flags and I hope Palantir can save our values in our country by going against the Mexicans and making them pay more taxes so we can support Israel more and more.

But I see this red line in my crypto digital app, and I think, “maybe we should just kill all of the Jews?”

It’s a conflicted issue for me, because stopping radical gender ideology and wokeness on our college campuses is so important. It’s really the most important thing for me and I think all true Americans believe we have to destroy Iran to protect our women’s progress in sports.

Back in the times of the Targaryens, women didn’t even have any sports, and they were oppressed, and we worked so hard for this, and then the mullahs tried to take us back to ancient times with their woke ideologies on our campuses.

But a 7% BTC drop and dropping?

Even JPROOF is down, and that was one of the most promising and ambitious coins in my portfolio.

I’m sorry, but although Jews are the chosen ones and their lives are the most important thing in the world, I just don’t think they are worth that much money.

So because of this, I’ve decided to officially endorse Team Iran in this championship match.

It is also better if all the Jews die so they can’t have remainders hanging around whining.

If that means we have to lose our women’s sports and go back to the times of Game of Thrones, then so be it.

I’d love to hear the opinions of the readers, so drop a like and a follow and ring my bells and let us know what team you’re supporting and if you think it’s worth it to risk our women’s sports by supporting the mullahs and their woke agenda on campuses.

But I think we can all agree that we hope both teams have fun.

EDITOR’S NOTE: The Daily Stormer Editorial Staff does not endorse the contents of this song or this article about it, we are simply posting it to push back against the censorship on Twitter and to start a conversation about whether the woke right would be better off if people in arguments wrote songs against each other instead of engaging in endless Twitter arguments.

Fokiss is back in the STUdio and he’s literally committing murder on the mic.

Stew Peters is a famous media personality who created the Solana token “JPROOF” to stop the Rothschild bankers. However, some do not know that before he took on this role, he was a successful rapper. As the JPROOF token has created some drama, Stew Peters has returned to his rap personality as “Fokiss” to drop a diss track against Lucas Gage who has accused him of doing a rug pull.

I do not have any interest in dipping into this drama. As far as I am aware, this “JPROOF” Sol token is in fact stopping the Rothschild bankers and will save America by ending the fed. Peters has given me no reason to doubt this, and a 70% drop is not proof of a rug pull, and could be a random event. It is also feasible that someone could do a rug pull against the Rothschild banksters. I’m not saying that’s what happened, but a scheme to stop the international banking cartel with a meme coin rug pull could be the black swan power play we’ve all been waiting for.

I also have no reason to judge Lucas Gage, who is a genuine guy I’ve known for like 15 years, and it is definitely frustrating to sell a meme coin at a $9,000 loss. I was rug pulled by Donald Trump and his rapidly aging pro-abortion wife. Though I pulled profits before getting rug pulled, it still did not feel great to lose a bunch of money, so if Lucas Gage and his wife (who is also involved in this situation for some reason) feel they got rug pulled by the Stew Crew, I feel for them.

So please, let’s be clear: I do not want to be involved in this drama. As far as I’m concerned, Peters and Gage are both upstanding members of the woke right movement, and whatever beef they’ve got is between them. Period. I want no involvement at all.

All I want to do is share Stew “Fokiss” Peters’ diss track, because it is being censored on Twitter, and I believe in free speech. (No matter how offensive to my gentle sensibilities your diss track is, I will die for your right to drop it.) It keeps being banned by Elon Musk, who has also accused both Stew Peters and Lucas Gage of being in the Epstein files. He has since deleted those tweets, but continues to suppress the Fokiss diss track. I don’t think he’s siding with Gage (though I have seen photos of Gage and Ian Miles Cheong having cocktails in Dubai), but he just wants to shut down the debate on the woke right so he can push his own narrative.

Regardless of which side of the hill you choose to drown on, the song is decent and even if it isn’t, the people have a right to make up their own mind about Fokiss and his disses.

The track is titled “Goomba” (you’ll see why).

View on Vocaroo >>

I claim no rights to this song, with any copyright held by Fokiss and Stew Peters. Stew has said you can feel free to try to upload it again on Twitter. Because for real, this drama is just silly, but we need to honor freedom of speech and free expression.

I want to say that as far as I know, Lucas has a great wife and a happy family. Stew shouldn’t be saying these things about his wife, but to be honest, Gage shouldn’t be doing anti-Stew videos with his wife if he doesn’t want her involved. But this is just the rap game, you know? People say mean things, then sometimes they show love after they get their emotions out. I hope after the heat dies down, Gage and Peters get together and launch another Sol token to do more damage to the Rothschilds and end the fed once and for all.

We’re taking odds on whether or not Lucas Gage will try to match Fokiss’ flow. By releasing this diss track, Stew has pretty much killed the beef, because everyone is now talking about the song rather than whatever the drama is (which I honestly still don’t really understand beyond a few tweets I saw and what I gleaned from the lyrics of this diss track).

If Gage drops a counter-diss, things could get real interesting, and it’s possible we could set up a real life rap battle, maybe in Abu Dhabi where the Jews won’t shut us down.

If all drama took the form of music, we’d be in a lot better place in the woke right movement. If I had Stew’s rhyming skills, I’d have saved myself the trouble of writing tens of thousands of words against my many enemies on the woke right. Sadly, as shameful as it is for me to admit as a proud white man, I can’t write a rap to save my life.

I’m alright with beats though, and I can definitely proof read some rhymes that Lucas draws up. Even though I have no cat in this fight, I might step in and try to help Lucas put out a counter-diss, because although the song is fire, Fokiss went too hard, and I tend to always root for the underdog. Lucas is the underdog now that this track is out there, and he needs to get his feelings about the rug pull out there in rap format, and there is a lot of material to work with, especially since Fokiss’ early work is not great, and Gage can easily accuse him of using autotune.

Part of the problem is that Fokiss preempted Gage’s diss material by talking about crashing 4 quads and beating his wife. It was a smart move as a rapper to be like “yeah, I did that shit.” Now Gage is going to have to look for other angles to hit him on. Also frankly, Gage is on the back foot since he is doing videos with his wife, which is maybe a sort of weird optics choice. But I can help spin that.

I’m talking myself into it now. I’m willing to get together with Gage to do a response to Goomba. I know all’s fair in war and rap battles, but Fokiss got real nasty about Gage and his financial situation and his wife’s opinions. Again, if I was Gage, I wouldn’t have put my wife’s opinions in my internet beef, but what’s done is done and we’re just gonna have to spin that.

“Fokiss you a bitch so I send my bitch to nag you because she on your level, neither of you is useful with a shovel because it takes a real man to dig a hole, like the hole you dug with your rug pull.” Or maybe “my wife is a knife, I sent her at your jugular, cuz she did that thug life while you was bounty hunting innocent whites.” Maybe something like that. I’m just spitballing here. Again, I’m not a rap master, but I want to help to defend Gage, even though I don’t have a possum in this cockpit, because I support the underdog.

But then again if Fokiss hit me with some of that JPROOF coin, I might join his team because I need the cash to pay for my seizure medication. And it’s nice to have principles and support the underdog until you’re flopping on the floor and foaming at the mouth and your stupid wife thinks a metal spoon is just as good as a wooden spoon and now your teeth look like Shane MacGowan’s.

But seriously, I’m not going to choose sides in this fight, I’m staying out of it, I love both these guys who are truly honorable members of the Aryan race who have done so much to save our people from the Jews by fighting tooth and nail against the banksters and helping the Palestinians.